Skip to main content

A kick in the nuts for female charisma.

In noticing how female leadership stands up to trump, I don't think many women would say they had felt proud of that one abortion. Or two. I find the question of this human right very controversial, as passing the pro-life choice takes away a woman's power, just as pro-choice can prevent responsibility, as it sustains selection in opportunity. Sincerely, I can't feel that we defend the integrity of our human rights, as we almost seem to justify that losing any power at all, is disrespect towards our moral stature.
Can a woman lack in sexual power and still be charismatic? Does female charisma then dictate the mind and not body? The difficult truth for some is that female charisma is a sexual authority by the default of human perception. What does the average American or Canadian think about that? There is a greater fear towards the future of our morality, that anti-abortionist would never step in, and that is regarding religious corruption and human nature manifesting itself on power through sexual influence. Hijab anyone? We are the West. We are the Best. We tell our selves that we are not brainwashed, but we have very weak minds. We let ourselves perceive admiration in attraction for attraction's sake (lust), just as people have social power for being popular, or attractive. In many avenues of the economy, people achieve power as its derived from their attraction or some facet of their own personality.
America isn't the best person to get advice from in my opinion. He is a great person to know, just don't take advice from him. Great place to live. And his woman, she can get an abortion. Is abortion freedom? Or is it power? Some consider it a right, and it's been around a long time.
Why are North Americans bad examples of the average person? Because only the ones with power ever come to represent them. When we listen to our charismatic figures, we are not listening to the average person, but a celebrity with social leverage, and we admire them, praise them, love them, and cherish them as the functionality of our mind at times. But, we are not these people. Would you like a trick question? How many times have you caught yourself admiring a socially powerful person and found them unattractive? My attention to detail informs me that there is a law of attraction underneath every moment of admiration I feel towards another person. Being said, these are the unrepressed sexual desires and unfathomable reaches from the imagination that exists through any human experience and are considered a part of human nature.
On a light note; What can we say for the status of women as sex symbols? If we thought priests were bad back in the day; for the group hypnosis they pull, then what will we one day say about hot chicks? Whom men worship, and greet, and court, and romanticize on, and make the entire meaning of their lives devalued on mostly because of sex. If we are pro-abortion, women will just as well manipulate men for their weak minds given it's morally acceptable to get an abortion, as they will fear monger and persecute male authority based on the little discretion they leave, as result of their weak minds. Pro-choice! It's like admitting we are a society of rapists and whores, but the learning lesson isn't justifiable cause to take away choice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watching the wheel go round, or the Vanier parkway song

Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway The gift of love Is the apparent partay You can bust a nut On the sugar queen swirl Or give back to charity In the crackhead world If it’s broke, You fix it Simple and done But their time is a mission And they sell their buns Where a heart string creaks And Brook sold her pearls A thief sold his crack Then pimped out the girl Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway Could we ever find love And bring back Sunday? It’s now a confession Of too many crimes Indifference is deliverance When you watch people die An ambulance for Murphy A wagon for joe These are the homeless With no where to go. We see city taxes As a way to brighten our world So we stomp down on trash And ambitiously hurl Do we make the effort To show we are afraid What disgusts us distrusts us And they hide in the shade Could all this money Go to a wage? Prisons and shelters And services made? Can a sl...

Who said that we need education?

How many people in society have landed jobs respectively, in the field of study or education they pursued after high school? I am guessing it's not a very reassuring statistic you want to use in taking the realistic success rate of the post-secondary system. But to some degree, we still hold back our judgment and remain to our convictions that the education system is a beneficial aspect of our society. How could it be doing anything wrong? People are using their time productively and working, and learning. They are learning well. Or more exactly, their senses are being stimulated conductively to the coordination of their memories, and they are paying a lot of money to be responsible for anything they perceive. Of special consideration to keep their theory and practice within the moral high ground of the instructor. Regardless, a university is an icon representing values and virtues, that are seamlessly integrated into our perception of society. We learn history, how to be ...

Why is it Dark? A criticism of critics.

If you think a film is dark, could you elaborate on that?  A comedy can be dark, an action movie can be dark, a horror can hit the unexpected and be a surprisingly well lit, yet it is what it is, dark.  In all of these examples dark can be used to define things that are unalike each other.   You could say a comedy has self deprecating humour.  The action film is comically violent or excesses in profanity.  The horror dwells into the grotesque and violent imagery. Should you just assume what this means according to the genre, or do you find the criticism of saying a film is dark(and calling it a day) doesn’t cut it?  What do you do when a film reinvents a genre or blends genres in an original way?  My criticism of the YouTube film critics nowadays, is that some apply this term to define a movie in their review, and no one ever seems to call them out.  I know the average viewer doesn’t want garbage, so why accept this? Ever since Sin City(2005), and...