Skip to main content

This has been droning on..(Perhaps a War Room Analysis)

 In recent news headlines, mysterious air drones have been spotted over several American cities.  Some say this goes as far back as November, but the origin is a mystery to witnesses and nations.  They have been spotted flying over city areas, military installations, and other places of notice or high interest.

If this is the wild west of drone air space, I think there should be regulations, and perhaps even a lawful interference to stop them from flying.  It is kind of strange how worried the U.S. officials were when a weather balloon flew over the continent of North America just almost a year ago.  It was called the Chinese Weather Balloon Incident(Jan28-Feb4/2023).  I believe many Nato countries denounced China for this.  If a spy balloon can exist, there should be more cause to worry or interfere with the flight paths of these air drones, which you cannot deny, is the most possible national threat the USA has encountered since North Korea completed its own intercontinental ballistics program.  While some drones may be controlled by copycat artists, daily there is a mass wave of drones coming from somewhere in the Atlantic Ocean that go into the night sky over New Jersey.  They have not been revealed for their purpose.  If you were unaware of the past ten years of Modern Warfare, air drones have been used on the front line like in the War of Ukraine.

So what would I do, if I was director of the FBI?  I would deduce the origin by reasoning.  The source is either internal or from a foreign country.  If it's foreign, it is clear that no friendly country would dare invade American airspace and do it in a worrisome overtone of the night skies. As well no enemy country would dare attack the USA in human-armed combat, they would likely do it by drone invasion if they had the resources to undertake the task, so that is a likely possibility.  If its origin is internal, it would only be a group with the money and infrastructure to output these drones, as they cannot be identified as coming from any known manufacturer.  The drones also have signal jamming and can cause non-mystery-originating drones to go flightless and crash.  Maybe Elon, or Bezos?  I don't think US domestic terrorists propriet a drone manufacturing plant and for what, are they delivering drugs?  Would be a laughable conclusion if it were somehow the mafia, but I doubt they would dare invade the night skies, they usually don't like to be noticed; they try to stay out of the news!  Could it be one of the American billionaires?  Maybe, but I doubt they would continue to direct this operation from the shadows for much longer considering the reaction of late by the public and American officials.

Would an enemy country be doing this to subjugate Americans to worry?  Just less than a month ago, after Biden authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles against Russian installations deep within Russian territory(Nov17/2023), Putin went on his broadcast system and made a threat to America, that he would get back at them and they would never see it coming(Nov19/2023).  For years Putin has been making threats, but did he finally knuckle down.  This drone invasion is a project of years in the making, and with their current purpose in modern warfare, this could be a scare tactic or perhaps the beginning of incrementally rising nightmares.  Drones can be made to do anything, and the scariest possibility is that these drones may have been produced for warfare.  

I say they should line up snipers along the coastline, equip them with night visions and spotters, and take out the drones while they are still flying over the ocean.  If they were made by a foreign country, the recovery of salvaged drones would reveal what materials these drones are made from, whether they have nationality markings(that's if they wanted to openly declare war), and a warning to that country to step down or face consistent reaction.  And finally, they need to recover a drone so that my friend Akane can finally stop telling people its humans from the future that have gone back in time.
  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watching the wheel go round, or the Vanier parkway song

Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway The gift of love Is the apparent partay You can bust a nut On the sugar queen swirl Or give back to charity In the crackhead world If it’s broke, You fix it Simple and done But their time is a mission And they sell their buns Where a heart string creaks And Brook sold her pearls A thief sold his crack Then pimped out the girl Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway Could we ever find love And bring back Sunday? It’s now a confession Of too many crimes Indifference is deliverance When you watch people die An ambulance for Murphy A wagon for joe These are the homeless With no where to go. We see city taxes As a way to brighten our world So we stomp down on trash And ambitiously hurl Do we make the effort To show we are afraid What disgusts us distrusts us And they hide in the shade Could all this money Go to a wage? Prisons and shelters And services made? Can a sl...

Who said that we need education?

How many people in society have landed jobs respectively, in the field of study or education they pursued after high school? I am guessing it's not a very reassuring statistic you want to use in taking the realistic success rate of the post-secondary system. But to some degree, we still hold back our judgment and remain to our convictions that the education system is a beneficial aspect of our society. How could it be doing anything wrong? People are using their time productively and working, and learning. They are learning well. Or more exactly, their senses are being stimulated conductively to the coordination of their memories, and they are paying a lot of money to be responsible for anything they perceive. Of special consideration to keep their theory and practice within the moral high ground of the instructor. Regardless, a university is an icon representing values and virtues, that are seamlessly integrated into our perception of society. We learn history, how to be ...

Why is it Dark? A criticism of critics.

If you think a film is dark, could you elaborate on that?  A comedy can be dark, an action movie can be dark, a horror can hit the unexpected and be a surprisingly well lit, yet it is what it is, dark.  In all of these examples dark can be used to define things that are unalike each other.   You could say a comedy has self deprecating humour.  The action film is comically violent or excesses in profanity.  The horror dwells into the grotesque and violent imagery. Should you just assume what this means according to the genre, or do you find the criticism of saying a film is dark(and calling it a day) doesn’t cut it?  What do you do when a film reinvents a genre or blends genres in an original way?  My criticism of the YouTube film critics nowadays, is that some apply this term to define a movie in their review, and no one ever seems to call them out.  I know the average viewer doesn’t want garbage, so why accept this? Ever since Sin City(2005), and...