Skip to main content

Modern Social Power

TLDR; Why does economic power dictate social class?


Where do you draw the line between success and failure?  I have led on to not impress people considering my lot in life, however, I don’t get lost without ambition considering the expectations of those people around me.  Some people excessively boast of their achievements when they compare themselves to those they envied growing up as if they feel like a victorious underdog.  It is possible I could have published 6 chapbooks of incoherent garble and called that poetry, though I feel like I would have dishonored the casual reader and led my reputation away like other poets have made for themselves.  Success is a benchmark you set for yourself, and while I still haven’t published my first fiction novel, I do feel successful given my life stability and day by day productivity.  I am not envied by money greedy hoarders, though I am mentally sound and emotionally in control, and a reliable employee to my business cause,  which is enough to say that I am a busy and hardworking person, regardless of my income.  Making more money doesn’t infer that you lead a busier life, though it subtly provides an impression of economic power, which people derive their order from in view of social class.  A person is more important than you when you choose to admire them, aside from this, you define what rules you by how you establish your own personal goals.  

On a side note, what path do you set to live the good life?  In essence, there are too many government collars that exceed the average income, for simply being iconic employees in a socialist society.  This has caused the ambition of the educated person to create for themselves a hardworking reputation by informing people that they lead a busier life because they make more money.  It’s a self-sustaining cycle of hypocrisy in power, and I see it all the time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watching the wheel go round, or the Vanier parkway song

Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway The gift of love Is the apparent partay You can bust a nut On the sugar queen swirl Or give back to charity In the crackhead world If it’s broke, You fix it Simple and done But their time is a mission And they sell their buns Where a heart string creaks And Brook sold her pearls A thief sold his crack Then pimped out the girl Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway Could we ever find love And bring back Sunday? It’s now a confession Of too many crimes Indifference is deliverance When you watch people die An ambulance for Murphy A wagon for joe These are the homeless With no where to go. We see city taxes As a way to brighten our world So we stomp down on trash And ambitiously hurl Do we make the effort To show we are afraid What disgusts us distrusts us And they hide in the shade Could all this money Go to a wage? Prisons and shelters And services made? Can a sl...

Who said that we need education?

How many people in society have landed jobs respectively, in the field of study or education they pursued after high school? I am guessing it's not a very reassuring statistic you want to use in taking the realistic success rate of the post-secondary system. But to some degree, we still hold back our judgment and remain to our convictions that the education system is a beneficial aspect of our society. How could it be doing anything wrong? People are using their time productively and working, and learning. They are learning well. Or more exactly, their senses are being stimulated conductively to the coordination of their memories, and they are paying a lot of money to be responsible for anything they perceive. Of special consideration to keep their theory and practice within the moral high ground of the instructor. Regardless, a university is an icon representing values and virtues, that are seamlessly integrated into our perception of society. We learn history, how to be ...

Why is it Dark? A criticism of critics.

If you think a film is dark, could you elaborate on that?  A comedy can be dark, an action movie can be dark, a horror can hit the unexpected and be a surprisingly well lit, yet it is what it is, dark.  In all of these examples dark can be used to define things that are unalike each other.   You could say a comedy has self deprecating humour.  The action film is comically violent or excesses in profanity.  The horror dwells into the grotesque and violent imagery. Should you just assume what this means according to the genre, or do you find the criticism of saying a film is dark(and calling it a day) doesn’t cut it?  What do you do when a film reinvents a genre or blends genres in an original way?  My criticism of the YouTube film critics nowadays, is that some apply this term to define a movie in their review, and no one ever seems to call them out.  I know the average viewer doesn’t want garbage, so why accept this? Ever since Sin City(2005), and...