Skip to main content

Feeling the rain

There had been a period of at least five years where I had kept my feelings on the inside regarding the college hate crime I suffered, and that was after being insulted and discarded by friends, who all thought I was overly complaining and mentally deranged.  I became afraid to speak about it, and while thinking about it continuously, I kept my emotions aside from everyone and stopped socializing with all the people that reminded me of the event.  I wanted to clear my head up.  I wanted to leave and come back with a measured distance to all these so called friends, explaining my core feelings, and what had upset me.  I was baffled and hurt, altogether becoming suicidal as to having to live and deal with a conspiracy out of college theatre, one people obviously deny to this day.

Though perspectively, they always touch base with me on the subject every time it comes up, as I am typified as always complaining about the same thing.  Nothing happened they say interruptively.  Nothing happened.  Though I am left with this notion of a tree falling in a forest, and I am wondering how I’ve come to learn of it. After hearing them speak, and being left with their opinion of my disconnected cognition, I knew they were assertively the problem.   I finally opened up to a friend of mine in 2012, though I was still terribly confused.  I felt no relief as to why I was still symptomatically suffering from severe stress, so many years after the conspiracy I hypothesize took place, and I was still just as upset about the betrayal I felt from the college acquaintances.  Does time move forward?  I am left with a police statement that it has been too long, and everybody might have moved on.  Might have..  Do I feel relief gauging my life into the unknown future considering my past?  No, I do not.

I take a certain fact into account; the accusation that I committed a terrible crime which never becomes specified.  In reality, I was told that I must atone for who I have upset.  Vaguely as it is introduced, I come closer to an understanding of what the meaning was behind my forced exit from theatre in this issue.

I was there.  I heard it.  I upset someone or some group.  And this was before I rejected their blame and stole money from them.  It's cause enough, that certain people within the educative structure are making money from student acting, that it would only be fair to contravene that the money was mine and rightly earned!  To this day, certain social figures are still slandering my name based on this account of theft, claiming I had taken advantage of a charitable organization.  There are too many issues that come back to me from the past.  There are too many people who are upset or hateful towards me for my actions that had occurred out of controversy.

If you sit down and sort this out, the way I have, whether I am right or wrong about my theories; you can expect that society has an issue with me.  If I am delusional, and spinning webs that misconstrue reality while tarnishing reputations with my literary assault, is there any relief in disregarding my cognition?  There shouldn't be.  People continually revert back to me to find understanding with a large social event, that(like it or not) is about me.  Maybe not listen to me?

Yes. I stole money. Yes. I last proved myself a poor actor. No. I am unaware that I had committed a crime, and no, I was never told as to why I was disallowed from performing in theatre.  These segmented sentences create a thought process for me, that validates a timeline of depression in my life.  I feel as though something greatly impactful and detrimental may have happened outside of my perception, and it is this event that people are using to vindictively disregard my cognition.  If it were a big enough lie, would it not make me crazy?

I feel as though people are too ambitious in asserting my lack of performance, and that they are advantage seeking when they make claim of my stressed nature and unenergetic state, as being disposed of for defunct or unintelligent thought process.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watching the wheel go round, or the Vanier parkway song

Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway The gift of love Is the apparent partay You can bust a nut On the sugar queen swirl Or give back to charity In the crackhead world If it’s broke, You fix it Simple and done But their time is a mission And they sell their buns Where a heart string creaks And Brook sold her pearls A thief sold his crack Then pimped out the girl Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway Could we ever find love And bring back Sunday? It’s now a confession Of too many crimes Indifference is deliverance When you watch people die An ambulance for Murphy A wagon for joe These are the homeless With no where to go. We see city taxes As a way to brighten our world So we stomp down on trash And ambitiously hurl Do we make the effort To show we are afraid What disgusts us distrusts us And they hide in the shade Could all this money Go to a wage? Prisons and shelters And services made? Can a sl...

Who said that we need education?

How many people in society have landed jobs respectively, in the field of study or education they pursued after high school? I am guessing it's not a very reassuring statistic you want to use in taking the realistic success rate of the post-secondary system. But to some degree, we still hold back our judgment and remain to our convictions that the education system is a beneficial aspect of our society. How could it be doing anything wrong? People are using their time productively and working, and learning. They are learning well. Or more exactly, their senses are being stimulated conductively to the coordination of their memories, and they are paying a lot of money to be responsible for anything they perceive. Of special consideration to keep their theory and practice within the moral high ground of the instructor. Regardless, a university is an icon representing values and virtues, that are seamlessly integrated into our perception of society. We learn history, how to be ...

Why is it Dark? A criticism of critics.

If you think a film is dark, could you elaborate on that?  A comedy can be dark, an action movie can be dark, a horror can hit the unexpected and be a surprisingly well lit, yet it is what it is, dark.  In all of these examples dark can be used to define things that are unalike each other.   You could say a comedy has self deprecating humour.  The action film is comically violent or excesses in profanity.  The horror dwells into the grotesque and violent imagery. Should you just assume what this means according to the genre, or do you find the criticism of saying a film is dark(and calling it a day) doesn’t cut it?  What do you do when a film reinvents a genre or blends genres in an original way?  My criticism of the YouTube film critics nowadays, is that some apply this term to define a movie in their review, and no one ever seems to call them out.  I know the average viewer doesn’t want garbage, so why accept this? Ever since Sin City(2005), and...