Skip to main content

Prejudice

When enough people hate an individual, it can cause that person to experience loneliness. It's a science of cause and effect, of course taking into consideration the details of personality, psychology, and the disposition towards their environment when it happens. Alienation is the only due estimation here. As it occurs, feelings of insecurity(lack of confidence), anxiety issues, and poor overall performance(as a persons' well being is socially benchmarked). The powers of the social imagination work in favor of the antagonists or hateful group, as they talk and express their annoyances regarding the individual, capitalizing on his absence. They share their philosophies on how to deal with him, and the power of their idea to rise against the individual, leads him voiceless in this society. It is apparent that the only people who have identified with him, have also agreed to ignore him, badger him, and lie to him. People are ruled by the laws of irony, and some will assert that the man is a source of grievance and despair on his own. Some members of the group will find a conclusion to their emotional stress with him by agitating or causing him to suffer. This sort of aggression is called prejudice. They cannot inflict physical pain on the alien as that will cause police reaction and this will lead to a greater inconvenience than it would have if they had ignored him. By 'ignoring' him they feel more dominant and superior(they will also adamantly state that they have done nothing to the individual in any way or form). Though they have actually exiled a stranger who faces the worst sort of punishment, people willing him to suffer. (To more clearly explain how the individual or alien is 'ignored', in the circumstance that he would ask a question or pose an issue with someone, he is undermined and treated as a nuisance for wasting time). Because of this crime that society has acted out against the individual, every observable inconvenience the man suffers is now a pivotal daunting step towards 'the fall of a man', which becomes a lesson in the source of tragedy's occurrence.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watching the wheel go round, or the Vanier parkway song

Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway The gift of love Is the apparent partay You can bust a nut On the sugar queen swirl Or give back to charity In the crackhead world If it’s broke, You fix it Simple and done But their time is a mission And they sell their buns Where a heart string creaks And Brook sold her pearls A thief sold his crack Then pimped out the girl Hoe hoe hoe Down Vanier parkway Could we ever find love And bring back Sunday? It’s now a confession Of too many crimes Indifference is deliverance When you watch people die An ambulance for Murphy A wagon for joe These are the homeless With no where to go. We see city taxes As a way to brighten our world So we stomp down on trash And ambitiously hurl Do we make the effort To show we are afraid What disgusts us distrusts us And they hide in the shade Could all this money Go to a wage? Prisons and shelters And services made? Can a sl...

Who said that we need education?

How many people in society have landed jobs respectively, in the field of study or education they pursued after high school? I am guessing it's not a very reassuring statistic you want to use in taking the realistic success rate of the post-secondary system. But to some degree, we still hold back our judgment and remain to our convictions that the education system is a beneficial aspect of our society. How could it be doing anything wrong? People are using their time productively and working, and learning. They are learning well. Or more exactly, their senses are being stimulated conductively to the coordination of their memories, and they are paying a lot of money to be responsible for anything they perceive. Of special consideration to keep their theory and practice within the moral high ground of the instructor. Regardless, a university is an icon representing values and virtues, that are seamlessly integrated into our perception of society. We learn history, how to be ...

Why is it Dark? A criticism of critics.

If you think a film is dark, could you elaborate on that?  A comedy can be dark, an action movie can be dark, a horror can hit the unexpected and be a surprisingly well lit, yet it is what it is, dark.  In all of these examples dark can be used to define things that are unalike each other.   You could say a comedy has self deprecating humour.  The action film is comically violent or excesses in profanity.  The horror dwells into the grotesque and violent imagery. Should you just assume what this means according to the genre, or do you find the criticism of saying a film is dark(and calling it a day) doesn’t cut it?  What do you do when a film reinvents a genre or blends genres in an original way?  My criticism of the YouTube film critics nowadays, is that some apply this term to define a movie in their review, and no one ever seems to call them out.  I know the average viewer doesn’t want garbage, so why accept this? Ever since Sin City(2005), and...