The unknown

In the event that I am not allowed to be acting, strictly given that this is because the school dislikes me, and we are aware that we got this far because they are jealous of me; what happens, hypothetically, if I were to ignore this and act anyways.   This is where it went, I stood up for my right to act, and the dean turned it against me; she said if you act poorly you will face escalated consequence. Again, this factor of the vague escalation, only attributes itself with the original consequence I was told I would suffer(apart from being disallowed to act) which is an unknown.   When a dean misleads a man(student) to believe he has committed a crime, and that he will suffer from dealing with a criminal record for the rest of his life, without going so far as to say why, or what the crime is, we can only speculate as to why the man feels threatened or believes her, considering the amount of doubt anyone would raise in having heard this story. This is where influence is held to be the power in motion. Causing someone to believe in something that is not true depends on a variety of factors; such as the victims predisposition to his already existing beliefs, the intelligence or acting power of the perpetrator, effects of drugs ingested, or the factor of luck or timing(though luck is an x-file). What is the unknown and what can be understood by questioning it? The unknown could be having to buy Maggie lunch for an entire week, or being disallowed from carrying a hockey stick on or around school property. There is for certain, the variable of the unknown. When a man is disallowed from doing something for reasons being purely that he is disliked, the element of jealousy is introduced as the motive, this is a universal. Why oppress a person, and disallow them from engaging in said action if inequality is not the point of conflict. All forms of jealousy originate from the point of conflict as being an inequality. I.e. She thinks it's unfair that Veronica goes on three dates a week. Adults can definitely be considered irrational due to their feelings of inequality in all factors of day to day life; when an issue of inequality occurs from the sense of purity of the self(non selfish corruption), we can then determine the act(s) as an injustice. Which is a type of inequality that is very different from jealousy. Having said that jealousy is responsible for why this unknown consequence is to be delivered, and that people are influencing the man to believe he should be worried about the unknown, leaves the evidential consideration that intimidation is at play. What can this unknown be that people are intimidating the man with, or influencing him to be worried about? Again, to strike the note of envy, they dislike a man given an inequality exists, and they want him to worry. That these people can't provide reason for their feeling of inequality, though I have hinted as to what this is, suggests that corruption rests behind their attempt at intimidation, and not buying the man a Mazda. For an escalation to occur beyond disallowing the man from acting, for reasons understood by the man to be an unknown, and that they will escalate into an unknown, again we ask why is he worried? Are these people serious about their attempts with intimidation, and is it clear that they are feeding off his fear; what could they possibly be implying with the man when they warn him regarding his actions.